What No One Tells Therapists About Group Practice, Private Practice, and the Cost of Every Choice

Not A Promotion, Not A Warning Label

Some conversations come wrapped in unnecessary drama, usually involving a therapist whispering, “I think… I might go solo,” as if confessing to a minor crime. The truth is far less theatrical. Choosing between group practice, solo practice, or a contractor platform isn’t a moral referendum. It’s an ecosystem decision. It’s an energy decision. It’s a choice about what your nervous system can realistically carry without leaving you wandering the clinical wasteland like a husk with a license number.

This isn’t a manifesto for group practice loyalty. It’s also not a love letter to the “be-your-own-boss” fantasy that social media has glamorized within an inch of its life. The goal here is much simpler: bring the lights up in a room most therapists have only seen in dim ambiance and vague hearsay. When the lighting improves, the choices do too.

Therapists often talk about career transitions in the hushed tones usually reserved for breakup announcements. Group practice gets framed as a developmental milestone you grow out of, while solo practice is painted as the ascension point. Neither narrative is grounded in reality. Both are stories we inherited from colleagues who were also guessing.

A group practice is not a holding pen for the “not quite ready.” Solo practice is not the mountaintop. These models are structures. You are the living organism inside them, and that organism has needs, limits, preferences, and a nervous system that reacts to instability the way a cat reacts to a cucumber.

Why This Conversation Matters Now

Therapists are being swept into new practice models at speeds that could induce whiplash. Platforms are promising effortless caseloads, group practices are trying to stabilize in an unstable economy, and clinicians are quietly calculating how many sessions it will take to pay for both rent and therapy after a particularly intense week.

Social media doesn’t help. It serves a curated buffet of “I quit my job and now I work ten hours a week from my sunlit home office!” posts, rarely followed by the less photogenic updates about tax surprises, overhead shock, or the sudden discovery that marketing requires intense investment, emotional exposure and, regrettably, consistency.

This piece walks into that confusion with a lantern and says, Here. Let’s actually look at what these choices cost, what they offer, and what really happens behind the curtains we pretend aren’t there.

The tone will stay light. The truths will not.

Before we start dissecting myths, remember this: whichever path you choose, you’re not wrong. You’re simply selecting the ecosystem that matches your life, your values, and your capacity to hold both your clients and the business infrastructure that carries them.

The most misleading comparison therapists make is rate-to-rate instead of system-to-system. They’re faster, emotionally simpler, and they promise certainty in a profession that rarely offers it. We line up session fees as if they exist in a vacuum, forgetting that every number is embedded in an ecosystem of risk, support, admin labor, benefits, and invisible scaffolding. A dollar earned in one structure does not function the same way in another. Until that distinction is clear, conversations about “making more” or “losing money” stay distorted, emotionally charged, and oddly unhelpful.

This is not a skim-and-scroll kind of piece. It’s more like a field guide you’ll come back to when you’re actually making decisions, running numbers, or spiraling after someone posts “I went solo and doubled my income in a week” under a ring light. Read it in one sitting if you want. Save it and return when needed if you don’t. The goal is clarity, not speed.

---

The Stories We’re Sold About Going Solo

There is a particular mythology that circulates quietly in therapist spaces. It doesn’t announce itself as a myth. It presents as common sense. Reasonable. Inevitable. Almost responsible.

If you listen closely, it usually sounds like this:
Of course you’ll go solo eventually. Everyone does. That’s the goal.

What follows are the most common stories therapists inherit about solo practice. None of them are malicious. Most are incomplete. A few are outright misleading. All of them deserve to be looked at in full daylight.

Myth 1: “I’ll Have So Much More Freedom”

This is usually the first hook.

The fantasy version of freedom looks like no meetings, no policies, no one commenting on your notes, and no shared calendar breathing down your neck. It imagines spacious days, flexible hours, and a work life that finally bends to your preferences instead of the other way around.

The reality is more nuanced.

Solo practice doesn’t eliminate structure. It relocates it. Every decision that once lived outside your body now moves inside it. Fees, policies, cancellation rules, tech platforms, office logistics, documentation standards, marketing strategy, ethical gray zones, and contingency planning all land on the same nervous system that just finished holding someone’s trauma for fifty minutes.

Freedom still exists here, but it comes bundled with decision density. Some people find that exhilarating. Others find it exhausting in a way that sneaks up slowly and then refuses to leave.

This isn’t about whether freedom is good or bad. It’s about recognizing that freedom without scaffolding can feel less like liberation and more like free-fall, especially during already demanding seasons of life.

Myth 2: “I’ll Make So Much More Money Per Hour”

This myth is mathematically seductive.

The logic usually goes something like this: if you earn X per session in a group and could charge Y on your own, then the difference must be profit someone else was keeping from you. It feels straightforward. It feels intuitive. It also leaves out almost everything that matters.

Hourly rate is not take-home pay. It’s a headline number. What actually determines sustainability is what that rate is quietly purchasing behind the scenes.

In a group practice, your pay is bundled with referrals, marketing, admin labor, billing systems, tech infrastructure, legal oversight, liability coverage, and often benefits like sick time or training support. None of those things are free. They’re simply not itemized on your paycheck.

In solo practice, you may charge more per session, but you also absorb every cost that used to be shared. Taxes, insurance, software, marketing, unpaid admin hours, and time off all come out of the same pot. The gross number can rise while the net quietly shrinks.

The more useful question is not “What’s the rate?”
It’s “What does this rate actually buy me, and what does it require me to carry?”

Myth 3: “Group Practice Owners Are Walking Around With Money Bags Like Scrooge McDuck”

This one has surprising staying power.

The fantasy imagines owners swimming in profit while clinicians do the real work. It frames the split as a moral issue instead of an operational one, which makes it easy to feel resentful and very hard to get curious.

The reality is far less cinematic.

Many group practices run on thin margins. Some hover at break-even for long stretches. Others use modest profit not for luxury, but as a buffer against slow seasons, economic downturns, sudden repairs, staff turnover, or insurance delays. What looks like “extra” on paper is often already earmarked for stability.

The portion of revenue that doesn’t go directly to clinician pay typically funds infrastructure. Rent, admin wages, payroll taxes, insurance, software, marketing, legal support, and compliance costs all live there. So does risk. When sessions cancel or reimbursements stall, the practice still pays its bills.

Naming this doesn’t invalidate real concerns about fairness or transparency. It simply removes the cartoon villain from the conversation. Resentment thrives when information is invisible. Reality tends to soften things, even when it’s inconvenient.

Myth 4: “Group Practice Is Training Wheels, Solo Is the Real Thing”

This myth hides inside professionalism.

It suggests that staying in a group means you haven’t fully arrived, while going solo signals mastery, confidence, and adulthood. The implication is subtle but sharp. Independence equals legitimacy.

That hierarchy doesn’t hold up under scrutiny.

Some therapists thrive long-term in group ecosystems. They love the collaboration, the shared ethics brain, the built-in consultation, and the absence of business management. Others feel constrained there and come alive when they build something of their own. Neither preference is superior. They’re simply different nervous system fits.

Solo practice isn’t higher on a ladder. It’s farther out on the risk spectrum. That works beautifully for some people and poorly for others, regardless of skill, intelligence, or experience.

You are not more real as a therapist because you work alone. You are just practicing inside a different structure.

---

The Hidden Scaffolding of Group Practice

Group practice is often discussed as if it’s just a building with multiple therapists inside it. A hallway. A shared printer. Maybe a Slack channel and a bowl of questionable snacks.

That description misses almost everything that matters.

What most clinicians experience as “just showing up to see clients” is supported by a latticework of systems, labor, and risk that rarely announces itself. You don’t notice it because it’s doing its job. Like plumbing. Or gravity.

This section isn’t meant to convince anyone to stay. It’s meant to make visible what disappears the moment it’s gone.

The Invisible Infrastructure Behind Your Fifty-Minute Hour

Every session that appears neatly on your calendar has already traveled through a maze.

Someone built and maintains the website clients found you on. Someone monitors SEO, manages directories, fields inquiry emails, and returns calls that don’t convert into sessions. Branding, reputation, and referral relationships didn’t materialize by accident. They were cultivated slowly, often expensively, and usually invisibly.

Once a client says yes, intake systems take over. Scheduling platforms, automated reminders, portal access, consent forms, releases, billing workflows, and payment processing all fire in the background. When insurance is involved, that labyrinth deepens. Credentialing, claims submission, resubmissions, follow-ups, and reconciliation live there too.

Technology carries its own ecosystem. EHRs, telehealth platforms, secure messaging, HIPAA-compliant email, phone systems, data storage, backups, and cybersecurity protocols all hum quietly so sessions can feel simple.

None of this is glamorous. All of it is required.

In a group practice, these systems exist before you arrive and continue functioning if you take a sick day. In solo practice, you become the architect, maintenance crew, and emergency responder for every one of them.

Ethical and Liability Protection You Don’t Notice Until It’s Missing

Ethics feel straightforward until they aren’t.

Group practices typically hold shared policies that protect both clinicians and clients. Crisis protocols. Mandated reporting pathways. After-hours procedures. Clear documentation standards. Termination policies that have been reviewed, revised, and stress-tested over time.

Legal counsel lives somewhere in the background. So does compliance. Business licensure, record retention requirements, privacy regulations, and data security standards are monitored and updated whether you’re thinking about them or not.

When something goes sideways, and eventually something always does, you’re not alone in the room with it.

In solo practice, you are the compliance department. You are the policy writer. You are the person who decides whether a documentation choice is “probably fine” or a future headache. Mistakes don’t just feel inconvenient here. They can be ethically and legally costly.

The Financial Bundle Beyond Your Rate

This is where the math quietly changes the story.

In a group practice, your percentage or flat rate isn’t just pay for clinical labor. It’s pay bundled with absorbed costs. Rent. Utilities. Furniture. Cleaning. Internet. Software. Insurance. Legal and accounting support. Marketing. Admin wages. Payroll taxes.

Sometimes benefits are included too. Sick time. Training stipends. Retirement contributions. Holidays. Sometimes they aren’t. Either way, the structure exists to hold those possibilities.

What this means in practice is that your compensation reflects more than the hour you sit with a client.

It reflects the ecosystem making that hour possible without asking you to fund it personally.

This doesn’t mean group pay is always generous or perfectly balanced. It means comparisons that stop at session rate are incomplete by design.

Emotional and Clinical Containment

There is a specific kind of regulation that comes from not being the only adult in the room.

Hallway consults matter. Quick check-ins matter. Being able to say, “Can I run something by you?” before it calcifies into anxiety matters. Shared ethical thinking matters, especially when cases get complex or emotionally charged.

Group practices, at their best, function as a distributed nervous system. The weight of clinical work doesn’t sit entirely on one set of shoulders. Witnessing happens. Perspective gets restored. Isolation gets interrupted before it becomes corrosive.

Solo practice can be deeply fulfilling. It can also be quiet in ways that aren’t always nourishing. When there’s no one to notice your face after a hard session, regulation becomes a solo act too.

The Culture Container

Culture isn’t a perk. It’s a nervous system buffer.

Shared language. Inside jokes. Rituals. Rhythms. Knowing how the week usually feels. Knowing who to text when it doesn’t. These things create psychological cushioning that doesn’t show up on spreadsheets but shows up everywhere else.

A healthy group culture absorbs some of the shock of hard weeks. It reminds clinicians they’re not strange for feeling tired, conflicted, or human. It normalizes complexity without pathologizing it.

In solo practice, culture doesn’t disappear. It becomes something you have to build intentionally or risk living without. Peer consultation groups, communities, mentorship, and collegial friendships don’t happen automatically. They require effort, money, and scheduling energy.

None of this is a reason not to go solo.

It is a reason to notice what you’ve been standing on.

---

A Concrete Example: Revenue-Share Model

Abstract conversations about compensation tend to fall apart the moment numbers enter the room. People either shut down, get defensive, or start mentally calculating how much someone else must be pocketing. None of that is especially helpful.

So instead of theorizing, let’s look at a real model and name what it actually does and does not do.

How the Percentage Split Works 

Some practices operate on a percentage-based revenue share model. For example, associates receive 40 percent of revenue collected. Licensed clinicians receive 50 percent of revenue collected. Payment is tied to sessions that are actually held and actually paid for.

That last part matters more than it seems.

“Revenue received” aligns clinician pay with real cash flow rather than theoretical income. It protects the practice from paying out money that never arrives due to insurance denials, chargebacks, or unpaid balances. It also keeps clinicians from being asked to personally subsidize overhead during slow weeks.

This is not a guarantee model. If a session doesn’t happen, the clinician doesn’t earn for that hour. At the same time, the clinician is not billed for rent, admin salaries, software, or marketing when cancellations spike.

It’s a shared-risk structure, not a wage illusion.

What Happens When a Session Doesn’t Happen

From the clinician side, the impact is straightforward. No session means no pay for that hour.

From the practice side, nothing stops running.

Rent still clears. The EHR still bills monthly. Phones still ring. Admin staff still get paid. Marketing continues. Insurance premiums don’t pause. Payroll taxes still exist. The building doesn’t care if the calendar has gaps.

This is one of the least discussed realities in group practice economics. The practice absorbs fixed costs regardless of clinician attendance, which means it also absorbs a significant portion of cancellation and no-show risk.

The model protects the business from hemorrhage without turning clinicians into mini-businesses responsible for overhead fluctuations they didn’t create.

When a Session Doesn’t Happen, the Hour Doesn’t Always Disappear

This is where the difference between having a policy and being protected by one becomes visible.

In a thoughtfully structured private group practice, cancellations and no-shows are not handled reactively or case by case. Clear attendance policies, informed consent on file, and consistent client communication create a framework where late cancellations and no-shows may still be billed according to agreed-upon terms.

When that happens, the clinical hour doesn’t vanish.
The work simply changes shape.

Instead of providing a therapy session, that time may involve client outreach, documentation, billing coordination, care planning, or follow-up tied directly to the missed appointment. Because the session fee is collected under established policy, the clinician is still paid for that hour, even though the labor looks different from a traditional fifty-minute session.

This distinction matters more than people realize.

It protects clinicians from absorbing the full financial impact of attendance disruptions while maintaining ethical transparency and clear expectations with clients. It also reduces the nervous-system whiplash that comes from feeling like income can evaporate instantly without structure, process, or recourse.

This is still not a guarantee model. Not every missed session is billable. Variability still exists.
But when policies are intentional and consistently applied, they create meaningful buffering.

Risk is shared. Impact is contained. Volatility is managed at the system level rather than quietly transferred into individual clinicians’ bodies and bank accounts.

That kind of containment doesn’t happen by accident.
It’s the result of intentional policy design, administrative follow-through, and a practice that treats structure as a form of care rather than control.

Where the “Other Half” Actually Goes

This is where imagination tends to get loud.

The portion of revenue not paid directly to clinicians funds the ecosystem itself. Physical space. Utilities. Furniture. Cleaning. Tech infrastructure. Admin wages. Payroll taxes. Legal and accounting support. Insurance coverage. Marketing spend. Compliance systems. Buffer for slow seasons. Preparation for future growth.

There is no cartoon vault. There is no Scrooge McDuck swimming pool.

In many months, there is simply equilibrium. In better months, there is cautious reinvestment. In harder months, there is loss absorption so clinicians don’t have to front costs personally.

Calling this out doesn’t mean every split is perfect or beyond critique. It means the story gets more accurate once the invisible expenses are named.

Group Practice as Shared Risk, Not Just Shared Revenue

One of the most misunderstood functions of a group practice is risk distribution.

In a group model, risk is spread across systems. Cancellations. Economic dips. Insurance delays. Seasonal slowdowns. Unexpected expenses. These pressures are held by the structure rather than concentrated in one person.

In solo practice, risk collapses inward. The same person is the clinician, the safety net, and the contingency plan. Some people find that manageable or even empowering. Others discover, too late, that the weight is heavier than expected.

Group practice is not simply about earning less per session in exchange for convenience. It is a system designed to absorb volatility so clinicians can focus on clinical work without constantly monitoring the financial weather.

That tradeoff is neither good nor bad.

It is simply a choice about where risk lives.

---

Understanding Different Group Practice Compensation Models

One of the most common ways therapists get misled is by assuming all pay structures are comparable just because they share a number. Fifty dollars is fifty dollars, right?

Not even close.

Compensation models don’t just determine what lands in your bank account. They determine who carries risk, who absorbs volatility, and who quietly pays for the parts of the job no one puts on a job posting. When those differences aren’t named, resentment fills in the gaps.

Let’s slow this down and name the three most common models therapists encounter inside group practices and adjacent structures.

Percentage Split Models

In a percentage split model, clinicians receive a portion of the revenue actually collected for their sessions. This commonly looks like one percentage for associates and a higher percentage for licensed clinicians.

This structure ties earnings directly to revenue while keeping overhead responsibility off the clinician’s plate. The practice covers space, admin, marketing, tech, insurance, compliance, and operational infrastructure. Clinicians are paid only when sessions happen and are paid for, which protects the business from paying out income that never arrives while preventing clinicians from being personally responsible for overhead during slow weeks.

What this model offers is flexibility and transparency. Earnings rise with caseload and reimbursement rates. There’s no artificial ceiling imposed by an hourly wage. At the same time, clinicians are not exposed to fluctuations in rent, software costs, admin payroll, or marketing spend.

Unlike salaried or flat-rate models, percentage-based structures typically place less emphasis on rigid productivity quotas. There are often baseline participation expectations, such as minimum session ranges that distinguish part-time from full-time status, but these are generally designed to support scheduling predictability, client access, and basic operational viability rather than to enforce constant maximum output.

What’s different is the quality of those expectations.

Rather than tightly enforced utilization targets or escalating productivity benchmarks, percentage-based models tend to allow clinicians more autonomy in shaping their caseload and pacing their work. The structure is often built around sustainability rather than surveillance, acknowledging that weeks are uneven, seasons shift, and human nervous systems are not machines.

That said, an informal pressure can still exist.

Because income is directly tied to sessions held and paid, some clinicians internalize productivity expectations even when none are explicitly imposed. Missed sessions may feel heavier than expected. Slow weeks can quietly trigger anxiety. Rest can register as lost income rather than necessary regulation.

For some clinicians, this cause-and-effect relationship feels motivating and fair. The system feels transparent. Effort and outcome are visibly connected.

For others, especially those sensitive to income variability or already prone to overextension, the fluctuation can feel destabilizing even without external enforcement.

The tradeoff here is variability, not surveillance. Income shifts week to week based on attendance and payer mix. For some nervous systems, that flexibility feels tolerable or even empowering. For others, it introduces uncertainty that requires additional internal regulation.

Neither reaction is a flaw. It’s information.

---

Flat-Rate Payout Models (Common in Larger Group Practices)

Flat-rate models offer a fixed amount per session, often something like fifty, sixty, or seventy dollars regardless of what the client pays or what insurance reimburses.

On the surface, this looks clean and comforting. Predictability is appealing, especially for clinicians who want to know exactly what each session yields without doing mental math. The rate is the rate. There are no surprises.

What’s less visible is why flat rates are usually lower.

When a practice offers guaranteed per-session pay, it absorbs significantly more financial risk. Admin staff are paid whether sessions cancel or not. Rent does not adjust for attendance. Insurance delays still affect cash flow. Payroll continues even when revenue dips. The business is committing to paying clinicians consistently, even when revenue is inconsistent.

Because of that risk, flat-rate models often rely more heavily on volume to remain sustainable.

Minimum session counts, target caseload ranges, utilization benchmarks, or attendance expectations are more likely to be named directly. While not always framed as punitive, these expectations tend to be clearer and firmer than in percentage-based structures because the math requires it. Predictable wages depend on predictable throughput.

As a result, flat-rate models frequently come with higher caseload expectations. Sustainability is achieved not through variability, but through consistency. The practice needs a certain number of sessions happening reliably in order to cover fixed costs and payroll.

For some clinicians, this feels stabilizing. Expectations are explicit. Planning is easier. Income doesn’t fluctuate week to week. There is comfort in knowing what each session yields and what is required to maintain employment.

For others, it can feel quietly pressurizing. Higher volume paired with a capped rate can create a treadmill effect. You stay busy, but upward movement is limited. Rest does not change the math. Taking fewer sessions directly conflicts with the structure that makes the model viable.

For clinicians early in their careers or navigating demanding life seasons, that tradeoff may be worth it. Stability can be deeply regulating.

For others, especially over time, the structure can begin to feel constraining rather than containing.

Again, this is not about which model is better. It’s about understanding how compensation structures shape workload, expectations, autonomy, and nervous system impact.

---

Contractor and Platform-Style Rates (Often Confused with Employment)

This is where comparisons get especially muddy.
The most misleading comparison therapists make is rate-to-rate instead of system-to-system, and contractor roles make that mistake almost irresistible.

Contractor positions often advertise flat per-session rates that look attractive on their own. Sometimes the number is even higher than what a clinician sees in a group practice. The difference lives in the fine print. These are 1099 arrangements. You are not an employee. You are a contractor supplying labor.

That distinction carries weight.

There are no benefits. No employer-paid taxes. No sick pay. No paid holidays. No retirement contributions. No paid training. No shared liability. Often, there is minimal admin support beyond basic tech access. You are functionally running a micro-business inside someone else’s platform.

To make this concrete, let’s walk through a realistic example.

Imagine a contractor role advertising $100 per session.

On the surface, that sounds strong. But that number is not take-home pay. It is gross revenue.

Before that money can support your actual life, several deductions quietly happen.

First, taxes. Many self-employed clinicians set aside approximately 25–30% for federal, state, and self-employment taxes. On a $100 session, that immediately reduces usable income to roughly $70–75.

Next come benefits you now fund yourself. Health insurance premiums. Retirement contributions. Disability insurance. These costs vary widely, but even modest coverage can reduce per-session net by another $10–20 when averaged out.

Then there are professional costs. Liability insurance. Consultation. Supervision if required. Continuing education. Licensing fees. Spread across sessions, these often shave off another $5–10 per hour.

What remains may realistically land closer to $45–55 per session in true take-home value.

And that is before accounting for unpaid time.

No-shows. Cancellations. Documentation. Emails. Schedule changes. Emotional labor that does not bill. Sick days that earn nothing. Vacation time that pauses income entirely. All of that comes out of the same pool.

This is why a contractor rate that looks generous on paper can feel surprisingly tight in practice. The number does not lie, but it does not tell the whole story either.

A $100 session does not mean the same thing across models.

In a contractor role, that $100 is gross income. After taxes, self-funded benefits, professional expenses, and unpaid labor, the realistic take-home often lands in the $45–55 range, with no buffer when sessions cancel or life intervenes.

In solo private-pay practice, a $100 session may net slightly higher per hour, but only after subtracting marketing costs, software, office expenses, insurance, taxes, and unpaid admin. Depending on overhead and caseload stability, the take-home may land closer to $55–65, with all risk held personally.

In a group practice–equivalent structure, a $100 session is not paid dollar-for-dollar, but the portion received arrives bundled with absorbed costs such as admin labor, marketing, tech, compliance, insurance, and sometimes benefits. While the clinician’s direct share may look lower on paper, the effective net can be comparable or higher once expenses and unpaid labor are factored out. The nervous system cost is often lower because volatility and infrastructure are shared.

To make this visible, imagine a clinician receives $50 from that $100 session.

That $50 is not standing alone.

The practice absorbs costs the clinician would otherwise self-fund in solo or contractor work: approximately $8–12 per session in marketing and referral generation, $7–10 in billing and administrative labor, $5–7 in technology and systems, $8–10 in office space or professional setting, and $3–5 in compliance, insurance, and risk coverage. When averaged across sessions, paid non-clinical time, documentation support, and sick time protections can add another $5–10 in effective value.

Conservatively estimated, the system may be carrying approximately $36–54 per session in expenses and labor the clinician does not personally absorb.

Add that to the clinician’s $50 payout, and the effective per-session value lands closer to approximately $86–104.

This is the difference between pay as a number and pay as an ecosystem.

And even those numbers don’t tell the full story.

They don’t account for the benefits that resist clean math: community, shared clinical language, informal consultation that happens in real time, mentorship that doesn’t require scheduling or invoices, and the nervous system relief of not holding ethical uncertainty alone. They don’t capture the impact of practicing inside a structure where policies exist, support is accessible, and someone else is also watching the weather.

Those elements don’t show up on a spreadsheet, but they show up in longevity. In reduced burnout. In the ability to keep doing this work without becoming brittle.

Same number.
Three very different ecosystems.

Contractor and solo practice may look similar month to month, but they are not mathematically equivalent. Contractor work concentrates risk without upside, while solo practice concentrates risk with the possibility of growth, leverage, and long-term stabilization.

This model can work well for clinicians who need short-term flexibility, supplemental income, or a bridge during transition. It may also work for those who already receive benefits through a partner or another role.

It becomes risky when mistaken for stability.

Contractor work offers autonomy without protection. Flexibility without buffering. Income without scaffolding. That combination can feel freeing for a season and draining if relied on long-term without careful planning.

A $100 contractor session is not equivalent to a $100 employee session. Once expenses, risk, and unpaid labor are accounted for, the nervous system experience is very different.

Understanding that difference is not pessimism.
It is informed consent.

Note: Exact figures vary by region, payer mix, and practice structure. These examples are illustrative, not guarantees, and are meant to show how different systems change effective take-home value rather than to promise specific earnings.

Why These Distinctions Matter

The most misleading comparison therapists make is rate-to-rate instead of system-to-system. 

A percentage split isn’t greed. It’s a reflection of shared risk and shared infrastructure. A flat rate isn’t generosity. It’s a hedge against volatility. A contractor rate isn’t freedom. It’s independence paired with full exposure.

None of these models are inherently exploitative or enlightened. They are design choices responding to economic reality.

Once you understand which system is carrying which weight, the emotional charge around pay starts to quiet. Clarity replaces fantasy. Decision-making gets calmer.

---

What Solo Practice Really Asks of You

Solo practice gets framed as freedom, autonomy, and alignment. All of that can be true. What’s usually left out is what solo practice demands in exchange.

This isn’t a cautionary tale. It’s a translation guide. Solo work isn’t just “the same therapy, but alone.” It’s a fundamentally different job with a clinical role layered on top.

Wearing All the Hats (Even the Ones That Don’t Fit Well)

In solo practice, your job title multiplies overnight.

You are still the therapist. You also become the CEO, the admin department, the billing specialist, the marketing team, the IT help desk, the compliance officer, the bookkeeper, and the person who figures out why the printer has decided today is the day it will no longer cooperate.

Each role takes energy. None of them ask permission before pulling from the same nervous system you use to co-regulate with clients.

Some therapists genuinely enjoy this. They like systems. They like tinkering. They find satisfaction in building something from scratch. Others tolerate it at first, then slowly realize the cognitive load never really shuts off.

Neither response means you’re doing it wrong. It means you’re human.

The Marketing Mythology

This one catches people off guard.

Many therapists enter solo practice thinking, I’ve always had a full caseload. I’m good at what I do. Of course I’ll fill up.

What they’re often responding to is the memory of being fully booked inside a system that was already doing the attracting. Clients came from a group’s reputation, its directories, its insurance contracts, its SEO, its name recognition.

Solo marketing is different.

Now you are responsible for visibility. Website copy. SEO. Directories. Networking. Community presence. Possibly social media. Sometimes paid ads. All of it requires consistency and a tolerance for being seen before being chosen.

There’s also an emotional layer people don’t talk about much. Marketing can poke at imposter syndrome. Silence can feel personal. Slow weeks can trigger spirals that have nothing to do with clinical skill and everything to do with human wiring.

In a group practice, that emotional weight is diffused. In solo work, it lands squarely on you.

Admin as a Nervous System Stressor

Admin is not neutral labor.

Billing disputes. Late payments. Declined cards. Cancellation conversations. Policy enforcement. Tech issues five minutes before a session. Insurance portals that time out for sport. All of this carries emotional charge.

In group practice, much of that friction hits an admin team first. The clinician may feel it indirectly or not at all.

In solo practice, it hits you directly. Then you transition immediately into a session where you are expected to be calm, attuned, and present. There is no buffer. No handoff. No “let me check with admin.”

For therapists who are sensitive, neurodivergent, or already carrying a heavy caseload, that gear-shifting can be exhausting in ways that don’t show up on a schedule.

Financial Reality and the Costs You Don’t See Coming

Solo practice income is variable by design.

There is no guaranteed referral stream. No minimum hours. No paid sick days. No paid vacations. No one covers your costs while you rest.

Self-employment adds another layer. Quarterly taxes. Self-employment tax. Health insurance premiums. Retirement contributions. Liability insurance. Continuing education. Consultation. Supervision if required. Every dollar is yours to manage.

There’s also unpaid time. Notes. Emails. Marketing. Consult calls. Credentialing. Professional development. Sick days. Holidays. Vacation. The work doesn’t disappear when you step away. It just pauses the income.

Some clinicians thrive in this autonomy. Others find the feast-or-famine rhythm stressful enough to bleed into sleep, boundaries, and clinical decision-making.

Risk Concentration and Contingency Planning

In solo practice, you are both the asset and the single point of failure.

If you’re ill for a month, income stops. If your office lease changes, you absorb it. If a referral source dries up, you rebuild. If tech fails, you troubleshoot. If something goes legally or ethically sideways, you are the system responding.

That doesn’t mean solo practice is reckless. It means it requires intentional planning. Emergency funds. Backup systems. Professional wills. Coverage plans. Referral networks. These are not optional extras. They are part of the job description.

Seasonality, Stamina, and Mood

Caseloads are seasonal whether we admit it or not.

Summers slow down. Holidays disrupt. January surges. Economic downturns ripple through attendance. In a group practice, those waves are often softened by shared load and multiple clinicians.

In solo work, you feel every swell. In your bank account. In your body. In your mood.

The psychological impact matters. Financial unpredictability can quietly erode boundaries, increase overbooking, or push clinicians to work when rest is needed most.

Again, some people adapt beautifully. Others burn out faster than they expected.

Solo practice isn’t wrong. It’s just honest about what it asks.

---

Contractor Platforms and the Seduction of “Just Show Up”

At some point in their career, many therapists encounter an offer that sounds like relief.

Just see clients.
We’ll handle the rest.
No marketing. No admin headaches. No building from scratch.

When you’re tired, overextended, or quietly wondering how much longer you can keep doing this, that promise can feel like oxygen.

Why These Models Look So Appealing

Contractor platforms are designed to meet exhausted clinicians right where they are.

They promise flat session rates, quick onboarding, and steady referrals. They imply simplicity. They appeal to therapists who want to practice without thinking about websites, SEO, insurance credentialing, or whether their intake form needs another update.

For clinicians coming out of agency work or navigating burnout, this can feel like the middle path. Not quite solo. Not quite group. Just enough distance from the chaos to breathe.

The appeal is real. It’s also incomplete.

The Reality of 1099 Work

In contractor models, you are not an employee. You are a 1099 contractor providing labor.

That distinction carries weight.

There are no benefits. No employer-paid taxes. No sick pay. No paid holidays. No retirement contributions. No paid training or consultation. No safety net when your energy dips or life intervenes.

Every professional cost comes out of your pocket. Taxes. Health insurance. Liability insurance. Continuing education. Supervision if required. Time off. It all belongs to you.

In California, there is an additional layer many therapists don’t realize until after the fact.

Under AB5, psychotherapy services are generally not permitted to be provided under a 1099 contractor arrangement when the practice controls core aspects of the work. This means California-based group practices cannot legally bring therapists on as independent contractors in the way many people imagine. Pre-licensed clinicians, in particular, are explicitly prohibited from working as 1099 contractors in the state.

The California Board of Behavioral Sciences also does not allow clinical hours earned under 1099 contractor arrangements to count toward licensure. Pre-licensed therapists should not be working under this pay structure at all, and hours accrued in these roles are not recognized toward licensure requirements. This is not a loophole or a technicality. It is a regulatory boundary designed to protect both clinicians in training and the clients they serve.

That legal boundary matters.

It does not, however, stop companies whose base of operations sits outside California from offering 1099 roles to California clinicians. Large platforms headquartered in states like New York may still classify clinicians as contractors, even while the clinical labor is performed in California. This creates a gray-zone experience for therapists, where the work feels like employment but the protections do not exist.

What often gets overlooked is how quickly the costs of this arrangement accumulate.

A session rate that looks competitive on paper can shrink substantially once self-employment tax, health coverage, retirement savings, professional insurance, and unpaid time are factored in. The rate doesn’t lie, but it rarely tells the whole story.

Contractor work can be useful in specific seasons. It can function as a bridge, a supplement, or a temporary solution when other protections exist. It becomes risky when mistaken for employment-level stability in a state where the legal and financial responsibility ultimately rests on the clinician.

Autonomy without protection is still exposure. Understanding that difference isn’t pessimism. It’s informed consent.

Control, Culture, and Clinical Fit

Contractor platforms also limit control in ways that aren’t always obvious upfront.

You may have little say over fees, policies, scheduling expectations, or client assignment. Clinical culture is often standardized. Consultation may be minimal or optional. Ethical decision-making happens without a shared values container.

For some therapists, this feels freeing. For others, it feels oddly isolating. You are independent without being supported, connected without being held.

It’s a particular kind of professional loneliness.

Comparing Contractor Work to Group and Solo Models

When placed side by side, the differences become clearer.

In group practice, pay may be lower per session on paper, but it is bundled with infrastructure, admin support, and shared risk. In solo practice, pay may be higher per session, but responsibility is total and unavoidable.

Contractor platforms offer something else. They reduce setup and visibility work while transferring nearly all financial and emotional risk to the clinician. The company carries low overhead. You carry everything else.

This isn’t inherently unethical. It’s a business model. The issue arises when it’s mistaken for stability or compared directly to employee pay without adjusting for taxes, benefits, and unpaid labor.

A fifty-dollar contractor session is not the same as a fifty-dollar group session. The math and the nervous system impact are different.

Who These Models Work Best For

Contractor work can make sense in specific seasons.

It may suit clinicians who need flexibility, supplemental income, or a temporary bridge. It can work for those who already have benefits through a partner or other employment. It can function as a short-term solution while building something else.

It becomes risky when treated as a long-term anchor without contingency planning.

Just showing up is never just showing up. Someone always pays for the structure. In contractor models, that someone is usually you.

---

Burnout, Sustainability, and Career Trajectories

Burnout doesn’t arrive all at once. It drifts in gradually, disguised as dedication, professionalism, or “just a busy season.” Practice models play a far larger role in this than most therapists are taught to notice.

How you work shapes how long you can work.

How Different Models Shape Burnout Risk

Group practice, when well-run, can extend a therapist’s career. Shared admin labor reduces cognitive overload. Built-in consultation prevents clinical isolation. Clear boundaries around non-clinical tasks protect energy that would otherwise be siphoned into logistics.

That doesn’t mean group practice is burnout-proof. Poor culture, unclear expectations, or misaligned values can create their own forms of exhaustion. Still, the structure itself often offers shock absorption. You are rarely holding everything alone.

Solo practice can be deeply satisfying. It can also accelerate burnout when boundaries are porous, admin tasks sprawl, or isolation amplifies vicarious trauma. Without intentional support, the same autonomy that feels liberating early on can morph into relentless responsibility.

Contractor work introduces a different risk profile. High session volume paired with minimal structural support can create a churn cycle. Clinicians stay booked but under-resourced. Rest becomes optional. Reflection gets crowded out by throughput.

None of these outcomes are guaranteed. They’re tendencies shaped by structure, not personal strength.

Your Nervous System as a Key Stakeholder

This is where the conversation often needs to slow down.

Some nervous systems tolerate variability well. Others crave predictability. Some people find energy in autonomy. Others regulate through collaboration. Neither is superior.

Questions worth sitting with include how you respond to income fluctuation, unexpected emails, and administrative ambiguity. Notice whether decision-making energizes you or drains you. Pay attention to whether solitude restores you or quietly isolates you.

The right model is the one your nervous system can inhabit long-term without requiring constant self-correction or white-knuckling.

Career Arcs Are Not Linear

Therapist careers don’t move in straight lines.

Many clinicians move between models over time. Group practice early on. Solo later. Back to group during caregiving seasons. Contractor work as a bridge. Hybrid arrangements that evolve with life circumstances.

There is no final destination that locks you into legitimacy. There is only fit, at this moment, with the option to reassess later.

Sustainable careers are adaptive, not performative.

---

Professional Growth, Mentorship, and Career Development

One of the quieter myths therapists absorb is that growth only happens through independence. As if staying in a group means stagnation, while going solo automatically unlocks creativity, leadership, and professional evolution.

That story sounds neat. It’s also incomplete.

Growth doesn’t actually come from autonomy alone. It comes from access, scaffolding, collaboration, and having enough support that creativity isn’t constantly competing with survival.

Development Pathways in Group Practice

Group practices, when intentionally designed, can function as incubators rather than holding tanks.

Supervision and mentorship aren’t just boxes to check. They’re living processes. You get feedback in real time. You overhear how colleagues think through ethical gray areas. You absorb language, pacing, and clinical intuition simply by being in proximity to other minds at work.

Many group practices also create room for expansion beyond the therapy hour. Clinicians may be invited to write blog content, contribute to educational resources, co-create workshops, develop groups, build courses, or participate in podcasts and community programming. Ideas don’t have to live or die in your own head. They can be shaped collaboratively, tested with support, and refined without requiring you to bankroll the entire experiment yourself.

Some practices offer leadership pathways, supervision tracks, consultation roles, or opportunities to help shape culture and systems. Others encourage clinicians to explore specializations, teach, or develop creative projects alongside their clinical work.

For therapists who want to deepen their craft, experiment safely, or learn how systems work without carrying the full weight of building one from scratch, this environment can be fertile ground.

Growth here doesn’t always look flashy. It often looks steady. And steady is underrated.

Development in Solo Practice

Solo practice offers a different kind of freedom.

You can build anything. Groups. Courses. Writing projects. Speaking engagements. Retreats. You choose the direction, the pacing, and the priorities. No approvals required.

That freedom comes with a cost.

Every developmental opportunity requires intentional investment. Consultation isn’t built in. Training is self-funded. Community must be sought out and maintained. If you want feedback, you arrange it. If you want mentorship, you pay for it or barter for it. If you want collaboration, you have to go find it and then protect time for it.

Some therapists find this invigorating. Others discover that without external structure, growth competes with survival tasks. Marketing, admin, and income stability can quietly crowd out creative energy unless firm boundaries are set.

Solo development is possible and powerful. It just doesn’t happen by accident.

Different Kinds of Ambition

Not all ambition looks the same.

Some therapists want to master a niche. Some want to supervise and teach. Some want to write, speak, or create tools. Some want to build programs. Some want to quietly do excellent clinical work for decades without managing anyone or anything else.

Group practice and solo practice support different expressions of ambition. Neither is more legitimate. They simply privilege different paths.

The question isn’t which model allows growth.

It’s which model supports the kind of growth you actually want, without asking you to burn yourself down to get there.

---

Equity, Privilege, and Who Can Safely Leap

The narrative around going solo often frames it as a test of courage. If you’re brave enough, confident enough, skilled enough, you make the jump. If you don’t, the implication lingers that you’re playing it safe or holding yourself back.

That framing is not just inaccurate. It’s unfair.

The Uneven Playing Field

The ability to go solo safely is shaped by resources long before it’s shaped by talent.

Savings matter. Partner income matters. Generational wealth matters. Student loan debt matters. Health insurance access matters. Dependents matter. Chronic health conditions matter. Neurodivergence and energy patterns matter. Geographic cost of living matters.

None of these variables reflect clinical skill. All of them affect financial risk tolerance.

A therapist with a financial cushion can weather slow months without panic. A therapist without one may feel the pressure immediately. A clinician whose partner carries benefits can tolerate contractor work differently than someone who relies solely on their practice for healthcare. A therapist without caregiving responsibilities has more flexibility than someone balancing children, elders, or both.

Calling this out isn’t about discouraging independence. It’s about dismantling the idea that going solo is simply a matter of willpower.

Releasing Shame Around Needing Scaffolding

There is no moral superiority in doing things the hard way.

Choosing group practice because it provides stability, benefits, community, or reduced cognitive load is not a failure of ambition. It’s often a deeply self-aware decision. It recognizes that sustainability matters more than optics.

Some therapists will choose group practice for a season. Some will choose it for an entire career. Others will move in and out of different models as life shifts. None of those paths require justification.

Support is not a crutch. It’s a strategy.

When the conversation shifts from “Am I brave enough?” to “Am I resourced enough right now?” the decision becomes grounded instead of performative.

---

The Emotional Ecology of Leaving a Group

Leaving a group practice is often framed as a logistical transition. Give notice. Transfer clients. Update your email signature. Move your plant out of the office.

What actually happens is far more layered.

This isn’t just a job change. It’s a relational shift. An identity shift. A nervous system shift. Those don’t move on a tidy timeline.

The Relational and Identity Rupture

Group practices hold more than caseloads. They hold stories.

Inside a group, you’re witnessed over time. Your growth is seen. Your rough drafts are remembered. Your jokes land. Your bad weeks don’t require explanation. You are known in ways that go beyond productivity.

Leaving means stepping out of that field of recognition.

Even when the decision is right, clinicians often experience grief. Nostalgia. Guilt. Anxiety. Relief that feels confusingly tangled with sadness. Some feel disloyal for wanting something different. Others feel unmoored without the rhythms they didn’t realize had been regulating them.

None of these emotions mean you made a mistake. They mean you formed real bonds inside a real system.

For Practice Owners: The Grief on the Other Side

This part is rarely acknowledged out loud.

When a clinician leaves, owners don’t just lose a line item. They lose someone they invested in. Someone they imagined a future with. Someone whose presence shaped the culture, the tone, the ecosystem.

At the same time, owners must immediately pivot. Clients need continuity. Hiring needs to begin. Budgets shift. Systems absorb the loss while staying outwardly steady.

This isn’t to center owners over clinicians. It’s to name that departures ripple through an entire village. When this reality stays invisible, misunderstandings multiply.

Naming it creates room for cleaner, kinder exits on both sides.

Exit Costs and Re-Entry Realities

Leaving a group also means leaving certain forms of automatic support.

Referrals slow. Culture disappears overnight. Consultation becomes something you must schedule and fund. There is no shared calendar cushioning your week.

Re-entry later isn’t always simple either. Openings may be limited. Pay structures may have changed. Teams evolve. The door isn’t always closed, but it rarely reopens in the same shape.

This isn’t meant to discourage leaving. It’s meant to encourage intentionality. Slow exits tend to preserve relationships. Thoughtful transitions protect everyone involved, including clients.

Leaving well is a skill. It’s worth practicing.

---

Numbers Reality Check: Doing the Actual Math

This is the part most therapists postpone until after the decision has already been made. Not because they’re careless, but because numbers carry emotional weight. Math threatens the fantasy. It forces specificity. It asks inconvenient questions like net instead of gross.

Still, this is where clarity lives.

Side-by-Side Scenarios (Without the Smoke and Mirrors)

Rather than debating ideology, it helps to look at structures side by side.

In a group practice, a clinician might see twenty clients a week at a 40–50% split. The per-session number may look modest at first glance. What’s easy to miss is what isn’t coming out of that number. No rent checks. No EHR subscription. No marketing spend. No billing labor. Sometimes benefits are included. Sometimes sick time exists. Even when it doesn’t, the clinician is not fronting operational costs during low-attendance weeks.

In solo private practice, the headline number is often higher. One hundred fifty. One eighty. Two hundred. The gross looks impressive. Then the subtractions begin. Taxes. Health insurance. Liability insurance. Software. Website hosting. Marketing. Office rent or share. Consultation. Continuing education. Unpaid admin hours. Sick days that quietly become zero-income days.

Solo insurance practice shifts the equation again. Reimbursement rates are lower. Volume often increases. Admin labor multiplies. Claims stall. Payments delay. Clawbacks appear months later like ghosts. The take-home can end up narrower than expected, even with a full calendar.

Contractor platforms compress the numbers further. Flat rates with no benefits, no tax support, and no shared risk. What looks “simple” often ends up being the thinnest margin once everything is accounted for.

None of these scenarios are inherently wrong. They’re just different equations.

The “Unseen Hours” Vignette

Here’s where the comparison usually breaks down.

Two therapists both say they “see twenty clients a week.”

One works in a group practice. Notes are completed. A brief meeting happens. A consult occurs in passing. Admin issues go elsewhere. The workweek might land around twenty-five to thirty hours total.

The other works solo. Twenty sessions still happen, but the week also includes emails, billing, marketing, scheduling, tech troubleshooting, payment follow-up, and business decisions. That same caseload can quietly expand into forty or more working hours.

Same clinical load. Different total cost.

When people say solo practice pays more, they often mean per session. What they don’t always calculate is per hour of life energy spent.

Why Net Matters More Than Gross

Gross income is loud. Net income is honest.

Net includes taxes. Net includes benefits you had to replace yourself. Net includes the fact that time off costs money instead of restoring you without financial consequence. Net includes the emotional cost of financial uncertainty, which doesn’t show up on spreadsheets but absolutely shows up in bodies.

Running the numbers doesn’t kill the dream. It grounds it.

When therapists take the time to map realistic sessions per week, cancellation rates, unpaid hours, and actual expenses, decisions stop feeling impulsive. They start feeling chosen.

---

Nervous System Reality Check: How Do You Actually Function Best?

You can make a decision that works beautifully on paper and still find yourself exhausted, anxious, or quietly unraveling six months later. That doesn’t mean you miscalculated. It means your nervous system was never consulted.

Structure isn’t just logistical. It’s physiological.

Core Self-Inquiry Questions

Some people regulate through autonomy. Others regulate through rhythm and shared containment. Most of us fall somewhere in between, depending on the season.

It’s worth noticing how your body responds to uncertainty. Income fluctuation. Unexpected emails. Client cancellations. Administrative ambiguity. Decision density. Visibility. Marketing. Being the final authority on every choice.

Pay attention to what happens when you imagine setting fees, chasing payments, or navigating insurance portals alone. Notice whether those tasks feel neutral, mildly annoying, or deeply dysregulating. That reaction isn’t a flaw. It’s information.

Equally important is how you respond to structure. Policies. Meetings. Shared norms. Feedback. Some nervous systems find safety in clear expectations. Others feel constrained by them. Neither response is more evolved. They’re just different wiring patterns.

Imagining a Week in Each Ecosystem

Try this as a somatic exercise, not a thought experiment.

Imagine a week in a group practice. Shared office space. Admin support handling logistics. Built-in consults. A sense of being held by systems you didn’t have to design. Notice what your body does when you picture that rhythm.

Now imagine a week in solo practice. Sessions plus emails. Billing plus marketing. Decision-making plus tech troubleshooting. Total autonomy paired with total responsibility. Observe whether your chest opens or tightens.

Then imagine a week in contractor work. Possibly high session volume. Limited control over policies. Minimal connection to a broader clinical culture. Consider whether that feels energizing, numbing, or precarious.

None of these images need to be judged. They’re data.

Fit Over Fantasy

Therapists are particularly good at overriding their own signals. We tolerate discomfort. We normalize stress. We intellectualize misalignment until it turns into burnout.

The right model is the one your nervous system can live in without constant self-soothing or collapse. The one that allows you to show up for clients without sacrificing your sleep, your relationships, or your sense of continuity.

Choosing structure is choosing how your body experiences your workday. That matters more than most career advice acknowledges.

---

Hybrid and Creative Options (Because It’s Not Just Two Doors)

The loudest narratives suggest a fork in the road. Stay in a group or go solo. Structure or freedom. Safety or self-actualization.

Reality is far less binary.

Many therapists quietly design careers that borrow from multiple ecosystems, even if those paths don’t photograph well for social media.

Blending Worlds

Hybrid models are often the most sustainable, especially during transitions.

Some clinicians maintain part-time work in a group practice while slowly building a solo caseload. This allows for income stability while experimenting with autonomy. Others keep a group position for insurance-based work and reserve solo practice for private-pay clients or specialized offerings.

There are also collectives and co-ops where overhead is shared but practices remain independent. These arrangements preserve autonomy while diffusing cost and isolation. They don’t eliminate responsibility, but they soften it.

Hybrid approaches acknowledge something important. Not every season calls for the same structure. What worked five years ago may not work now, and that’s not a failure of vision. It’s adaptation.

Designing a Custom Ecosystem

When therapists step out of binary thinking, creativity returns.

Instead of asking, “Should I go solo?” the question becomes, “What combination of support, autonomy, and risk can I realistically sustain right now?”

Consider your season of life. Energy patterns. Desired income. Capacity for admin. Appetite for uncertainty. Creative goals. Leadership aspirations. All of these inform structure more reliably than ideology.

Gradual transitions often protect nervous systems better than abrupt leaps. Timelines create containment. Parallel systems allow learning without panic. Custom ecosystems honor complexity rather than forcing premature certainty.

You are allowed to change your mind. You are allowed to move slowly. You are allowed to build something that fits instead of something that performs well in conversation.

---

Red Flags and Green Flags in Your Motivation to Go Solo

The decision to go solo is rarely purely practical. It’s usually braided with emotion, identity, longing, and sometimes fatigue that hasn’t yet been named as such.

Motivation matters. Not because there’s a right or wrong answer, but because why you’re moving shapes how the move unfolds.

When Going Solo Might Be Avoidance

This is the part that deserves gentleness, not judgment.

Sometimes the pull toward solo practice is actually a push away from something else. Conflict that hasn’t been addressed. Feedback that landed tenderly. Frustration with authority. Burnout that feels easier to relocate than to tend.

Wanting distance doesn’t mean solo practice is wrong. It does mean the relief you’re seeking might not come from changing structures alone.

If the fantasy includes phrases like “then I won’t have to deal with…” it’s worth pausing. Solo practice doesn’t remove discomfort. It changes its shape. Authority conflicts may disappear, but self-direction increases. Interpersonal tension fades, but isolation can grow louder. Burnout doesn’t dissolve just because your name is on the door.

Leaving primarily to escape rarely creates the spaciousness people hope for.

When Going Solo May Be Aligned

There are also motivations that tend to support a steadier transition.

Clarity helps. A sense of where you want your work to go, even if the path isn’t fully mapped. Curiosity about systems instead of resentment toward them. A willingness to learn business skills without expecting them to feel natural right away.

Aligned motivation often includes realism. You’ve run the numbers. You’ve thought about slow months. You’ve considered what happens when you’re sick or tired or bored. You’re not assuming solo practice will fix everything. You’re choosing it knowing it will create different challenges.

When the move is rooted in intention rather than reaction, solo practice has more room to become sustainable instead of just different.

---

Let’s give them somewhere to land.

---

Practical Takeaway Handout – The Expense Ecosystem: What You Actually Pay For (And What You Might Not Realize Yet)

Somewhere between “I could totally do this on my own” and “why is my EHR charging me like it’s a luxury yacht membership,” there’s a missing step: actually naming the expense ecosystem.

This handout is meant to de-mythologize the money part without shaming anyone for not knowing it already. Most therapists were trained in trauma work, attachment wounds, and the fine art of sitting with silence. Very few were trained in “why your quarterly taxes just jump-scared you.”

Use this as a checklist, a budgeting tool, or a gentle reality check when the fantasy of “just doing my own thing” starts whispering seductive nonsense.

1. Fixed Monthly Operational Expenses

These are the bills that show up every month with the confidence of someone who has never been ghosted.

Office-Related Costs

Rent or office share fees, utilities (electricity, water, internet, trash), furniture and decor, cleaning services, and office supplies tend to live here. Even if you do telehealth only, there’s often still a baseline “workspace” cost, whether that’s a coworking membership, upgraded internet, or a home office setup that does not involve balancing your laptop on a throw pillow like a gremlin.

Technology Infrastructure

This includes your EHR subscription, telehealth platform, secure messaging, billing software, website hosting and domain, HIPAA-compliant email, and a phone system or VOIP service. Tech is one of those categories that looks optional until you realize it’s basically your clinical container.

Insurance and Legal

Professional liability insurance, cyber liability insurance, business insurance, and periodic legal consultation (contracts, policies, trademark questions, consent form review) go here. These costs are not glamorous. They are the moat around your castle.

2. Variable Monthly Expenses

These costs fluctuate based on caseload, marketing strategy, and how much support you choose to outsource.

Marketing Costs

Paid ads (Google, Psychology Today, social platforms), SEO support, brand photography, graphic design, and printing costs live here. This is where the “marketing mythology” gets corrected fast. Algorithms do not reward excellent therapists for being excellent. They reward consistency and keywords.

Admin Support

If you hire help, this includes virtual assistant hours, admin staffing, bookkeeping, billing support, and sometimes an answering service. If you don’t hire help, the “cost” may show up as time and nervous system depletion instead of dollars, which is still a cost. Your body keeps receipts.

Clinical or Professional Tools

Supervision, consultation, CE trainings, assessments, therapy tools, books, and resource subscriptions belong here. In group practice, some of this is subsidized or built in. In solo practice, it becomes a line item you either fund or slowly abandon until your clinical brain starts feeling stale and sad.

3. Personal Costs That Become Business Costs When You’re Solo

This is the category that quietly turns “higher session rate” into “why does my net feel like it’s vanishing.”

Taxes and Financial Planning

Self-employment tax, quarterly estimated taxes, accountant or CPA fees, and retirement contributions belong here. In employee models, some of this is shared or withheld automatically. In solo and 1099 work, it’s on you to plan proactively, which is a charming system if you enjoy spreadsheets and mild existential dread.

Healthcare and Wellbeing

Health insurance premiums, dental and vision insurance, disability insurance, life insurance, and your own therapy are part of sustainability. This category is especially important because when therapists burn out, it’s rarely because they didn’t care enough. It’s because they didn’t have enough protection.

Time Off Costs

In solo and contractor models, time off often means zero income. Sick days, vacation, holidays, parental leave, and professional development days all become “unpaid” unless you build a structure that pays you anyway. Group practice sometimes covers some of this. Sometimes it doesn’t. Either way, solo requires you to engineer it.

4. Invisible Time Costs

These don’t show up in QuickBooks. They show up in your nervous system, your sleep, and the weird tension in your jaw.

Admin Hours

Scheduling, rescheduling, responding to inquiries, running cards, managing declined payments, chasing balances, completing notes and treatment plans, credentialing, and troubleshooting tech issues all belong here. In a group practice, much of this is absorbed or shared. In solo practice, it is your second job.

Emotional Labor

Fee conversations, angry emails, boundary-setting, crisis management without colleagues nearby, holding the weight of client stories with no witnesses, and managing professional isolation all live here. This is the category therapists forget to count until they feel mysteriously crispy.

Decision Fatigue

Setting fees, building policies, picking a niche, choosing a tech stack, deciding how visible to be, making marketing choices, updating paperwork, and constantly refining the system never stops. Solo practice is not one big decision. It’s a thousand small ones, forever.

5. Growth and Future Planning Costs

These costs separate “surviving” from “building something that lasts.”

Business Growth

Courses, accelerator programs, branding, website redesigns, launching groups or workshops, creating digital products, hiring contractors, and expanding space or services go here. This is the category that gets sacrificed first in feast or famine cycles, which is exactly why it deserves intentional planning.

Stability and Risk Management

Emergency fund for slow months, tech backups and redundancy, coverage planning for illness or leave, and building referral networks belong here. This is where you stop relying on hope as a financial strategy.

Exit Strategy and Professional Will

Document storage or transfer plans, instructions for clinical record handling if you are incapacitated, and legal documentation for emergencies all matter here. It’s not dramatic. It’s responsible care for clients and for your future self.

6. The Comparison Lens: Who Pays For What?

Here’s the simplest truth: every model pays these costs somehow. The question is whether the cost is paid by a shared structure or paid by your personal nervous system and bank account.

Category
Group Practice: Typically paid by the group
Solo Practice: Paid by you
Contractor Platform: “Included” but still paid indirectly

Rent/Space
Group: Covered
Solo: You
Contractor: Included (often virtual only)

Marketing
Group: Covered
Solo: You
Contractor: Provided (with limits and low control)

Admin
Group: Covered
Solo: You
Contractor: Minimal support

EHR/Tech
Group: Covered
Solo: You
Contractor: Provided

Health Insurance
Group: Sometimes
Solo: You
Contractor: You

Retirement
Group: Sometimes
Solo: You
Contractor: You

Payroll Taxes
Group: Employer shares
Solo: You pay all
Contractor: You pay all (1099)

Benefits
Group: Sometimes
Solo: You
Contractor: None

Risk and Liability
Group: Distributed
Solo: Concentrated
Contractor: Mixed (often unclear and still largely on you)

Time Off
Group: Sometimes paid
Solo: Unpaid unless you build it
Contractor: Unpaid

Income Variability
Group: Buffered
Solo: High
Contractor: High

7. Questions To Use With This Handout

What expenses am I ready to carry alone, consistently, without resentment toward my own life?

Which expenses am I not prepared to absorb yet, financially or emotionally?

What scaffolding do I currently rely on that I have been treating as “background noise” instead of support?

What would my caseload need to be to cover fixed and variable costs while still leaving room for rest, illness, and being a human?

When I imagine carrying this full expense ecosystem alone, does my nervous system soften into groundedness… or tighten into survival mode?

---

Download one-page handout here

This worksheet isn’t here to scare you, talk you out of anything, or force a decision before you’re ready. It exists because most of the tension around going solo comes from unnamed costs, not from the work itself.

Many therapists are already carrying a significant amount of infrastructure without realizing it, because a system is quietly holding it for them. Others are considering taking that infrastructure on without fully seeing how many pieces it actually contains. This handout brings those pieces into the light.

You don’t need perfect numbers. Estimates are enough. What matters is noticing what is currently shared, what would become yours alone, and how that shift feels in your body as much as it looks on paper.

Use this as a visibility tool, not a verdict. You’re not deciding your forever here. You’re simply giving yourself the full picture before choosing what you want to carry next.

---

Reflection Prompts for Therapists Considering a Shift

This isn’t a quiz. There are no right answers hiding at the bottom of the page. These prompts are meant to slow the momentum just enough for truth to surface, the kind that usually gets drowned out by comparison and urgency.

Take what resonates. Skip what doesn’t. Come back to these more than once. Answers change as seasons do.

Money and Practicality

Before anything else, safety deserves clarity.

What is the minimum monthly take-home income you need to feel steady rather than stressed? Not aspirational. Actual. What number allows you to pay bills, eat, rest, and not hold your breath every time you open your banking app?

How many sessions per week would that require in a group practice model? How many in solo practice? How many as a contractor once taxes, insurance, and unpaid time are accounted for?

If referrals dipped for three months, what would keep you afloat? Savings. Partner income. Reduced expenses. A backup plan. Or would the pressure immediately spill into your sleep and sessions?

Notice what comes up in your body as you answer. Tightness and calm are both data.

Nervous System and Identity

When do you feel most like yourself as a therapist? Is it when you’re collaborating, consulting, and being witnessed? Or when you’re working independently, designing your own rhythms, and making autonomous decisions?

How do you want your workweek to feel, not look? Spacious. Grounded. Stimulating. Predictable. Quiet. Connected. What drains you fastest, and what restores you most reliably?

What kind of village do you actually need? Supervision. Peer consultation. Mentorship. Casual hallway conversations. Intentional solitude. Be specific. Vague answers usually hide unmet needs.

Values and Legacy

Zoom out.

What kind of work do you want to be doing five years from now? What kind of therapist do you want to be then, and what kind of human alongside that role?

Which ecosystem best supports that future version of you? Not the version trying to prove something. The one trying to last.

Are you more drawn to deepening your clinical craft, building systems, leading others, or creating new offerings? Different structures nourish different callings.

Let these answers be layered. Ambivalence is allowed. So is changing your mind later.

---

Choosing Your Ecosystem With Eyes Open

There is no finish line in this conversation, no moment where a therapist arrives and stays forever. There are only structures, seasons, and the ongoing work of matching one to the other with honesty.

Group practice is not a lesser stage. Solo practice is not a higher plane. Contractor work is not cheating or selling out. These are ecosystems. You are the living thing inside them.

The mistake isn’t choosing one over another. The mistake is choosing based on myths instead of mechanics.

It’s easy to fixate on per-session rates and forget to ask what those numbers cost in isolation, unpaid labor, and nervous system strain. It’s tempting to chase autonomy without accounting for the weight that comes with it. It’s equally tempting to stay in familiar structures without revisiting whether they still fit.

The more useful questions sound different.

Which model costs you the least in burnout, anxiety, and chronic stress?
Which one supports your body as much as your bank account?
Which structure protects you from risks you can’t reasonably carry alone?

Before you decide to go solo, don’t just ask what you’ll earn per hour. Ask what you’ll be required to hold every week. Ask what happens when you’re sick, tired, grieving, or simply human. Ask which ecosystem allows you to do good work without sacrificing your future self on the altar of a borrowed story.

There is no correct choice. There is only the one that lets you practice with integrity, sustainability, and enough room to breathe.

Choose that.

So… Which Door Makes the Most Sense?

After all the math, myth-busting, nervous system check-ins, and ecosystem unpacking, this is usually the moment where therapists want a verdict.

Just tell me which one is best.

That desire makes sense. Clarity feels regulating. Final answers promise relief. In a profession built on uncertainty, a clean conclusion sounds like mercy.

But if we strip away fantasy, comparison culture, and ring-light economics, the blog lands here:

Group practice makes the most sense when stability, sustainability, and development matter.

When you want your primary job to be clinical work, not infrastructure management. When mentorship, shared systems, and buffered risk protect your nervous system and your longevity. When growth is supported through proximity, collaboration, and steady scaffolding rather than constant self-funding.

Solo practice makes the most sense when autonomy, authorship, and long-term leverage outweigh the cost of risk.

When you are resourced enough to carry variability, willing to absorb admin and uncertainty, and clear about the kind of work you want to build. When independence isn’t an escape, but a deliberate choice made with eyes open and buffers in place.

Contractor work makes the most sense when flexibility is needed temporarily and protection exists elsewhere.

As a bridge. As supplemental income. As a short-term solution during transition, burnout recovery, or life shifts. It can be useful when benefits, financial stability, or support live outside the role. It becomes precarious when mistaken for long-term sustainability.

The most beneficial system is not the boldest one.

It’s the one that allows a therapist to keep practicing without becoming brittle.

There is no final boss here.

No gold star for independence.

No moral upgrade for doing things the hard way.

There are only ecosystems.

And seasons.

And the ongoing work of matching one to the other with honesty.

Or, in the language this blog keeps returning to:

Choose the door that lets you hold your clients without also having to carry the entire building they sit in.

That is the throughline.

And it’s a strong one.

The Room Inside the Door: Why Pay Models Matter as Much as Practice Type

You can choose the right door and still end up in the wrong room if the pay model inside that door doesn’t fit you.

This is the part of the conversation that often gets skipped. Therapists spend weeks deciding where they want to work, then accept the first compensation structure attached to it as if pay models are neutral furniture instead of load-bearing architecture.

They aren’t.

Pay models are nervous system environments.
They shape pacing, pressure, rest, and self-perception long before they affect income. They quietly decide whether a slow week feels tolerable or catastrophic, whether rest feels earned or dangerous, and whether your body experiences work as sustainable or perpetually urgent.

Once you know which ecosystem fits, the next question isn’t “How much can I make?”
It’s “How does this pay model ask me to work?”

Who Thrives in Percentage-Based Models

Percentage-based models tend to work best for clinicians who value autonomy, flexibility, and transparency.

In these structures, pay rises and falls with sessions held and paid. There’s no fixed ceiling imposed by an hourly wage, and clinicians often have meaningful influence over their caseload size, scheduling patterns, and pacing. Overhead, admin labor, marketing, tech, compliance, and infrastructure are carried by the practice rather than billed back to the clinician.

This model often suits therapists who:

• Like seeing a clear relationship between effort and earnings
• Can tolerate income variability without personalizing it as failure
• Prefer autonomy over rigid productivity enforcement
• Regulate well without guaranteed weekly sameness

What matters here is not the math, but the meaning the nervous system assigns to variability. For some clinicians, flexibility feels energizing. For others, it quietly erodes safety. Neither response is a flaw. It’s data.

It’s also important to clarify a legal reality: in California, pre-licensed therapists are not authorized to work as 1099 contractors. Percentage-based employee models are common for associates because they maintain legal employment status while allowing flexibility. Any arrangement that treats a pre-licensed clinician as a contractor should raise immediate compliance concerns.

Who Thrives in Flat-Rate or Salaried Models

Flat-rate and salaried models tend to work best for clinicians who need predictability and reduced cognitive load, even if the earning ceiling is lower.

These structures offer consistency. You know what each session yields. You know what’s expected. The math doesn’t change week to week. For nervous systems that find safety in clarity and routine, that stability can be deeply regulating.

This model often suits therapists who:

• Are early in their careers and still building confidence
• Are navigating caregiving, health issues, or high life demands
• Feel drained by tracking variability
• Prefer clearly defined expectations and volume

The tradeoff is that sustainability usually depends on consistency and throughput. Because the practice is absorbing more payroll risk, caseload expectations are often clearer and sometimes higher. Upward earning potential is capped, and rest doesn’t change the math.

This is where an important distinction matters: more predictable is not the same thing as more supportive.
Predictability can reduce anxiety, but high volume paired with limited flexibility can still exhaust a clinician over time. Stability and sustainability are related, but they are not identical.

Who Should Be Cautious With 1099 Contractor Pay

Contractor pay works best when protection exists elsewhere.

It can be a useful option for clinicians who already have benefits through a partner, another job, or a different system. It can function well as supplemental income or a short-term bridge. It can also offer flexibility during transitions.

It becomes risky when treated as a long-term foundation.

1099 pay shifts all risk to the clinician. Taxes, benefits, time off, professional expenses, and income gaps are self-funded. There is no buffering when life intervenes. For pre-licensed clinicians in California, it is also not legally permissible, which alone should remove it from consideration in that context.

Contractor work is autonomy without protection. Flexibility without scaffolding. That combination can feel freeing for a season and quietly depleting over time if the nervous system never gets to rest inside something held.

Why Burnout Is Often About Compensation Mismatch, Not Weak Boundaries

Burnout is frequently framed as a personal failing. Therapists are told to set better boundaries, rest more, or “work smarter.”

What’s often missing from that conversation is structure.

A pay model that rewards constant output, penalizes rest, or ties safety to volume will exhaust even the most skilled boundary-setter. Conversely, a well-matched compensation structure can make a demanding season survivable without requiring superhuman regulation.

The wrong pay model can make the right door feel unbearable.
The right one can make a hard chapter livable.

This isn’t about choosing the most impressive option. It’s about choosing the room where your nervous system can actually exhale.

Pay doesn’t just fund your life.
It shapes how your body experiences your workday.

That deserves just as much consideration as the door you walk through.

TL;DR

Therapists love comparing session rates like they exist in a vacuum. They don’t. The most misleading comparison is rate-to-rate instead of system-to-system. A dollar earned inside one structure does not function the same way inside another, because the surrounding ecosystem determines what that dollar has to carry. In some models, your primary job is holding clients. In others, you are holding clients and the business infrastructure that makes those sessions possible. Those are fundamentally different jobs, even when the calendar looks similar.

Group practice is often treated like a phase you grow out of and solo practice gets framed like the final boss of professional legitimacy. Both stories are fiction written by anxious humans who needed the world to feel linear. Group, solo, and contractor work are not moral identities. They’re operating systems. The question is not which one looks more impressive. The question is which one you can live inside without burning down.

In a group practice, the pay you see is bundled with invisible scaffolding. Referrals, marketing, admin labor, billing systems, policies, compliance infrastructure, tech, and often a consultation culture are already running in the background. You are not paying for those with a separate invoice, but they are not free. They’re baked into the split or rate. The tradeoff is that your income is tied to sessions held and paid, but many costs and a significant amount of volatility are absorbed by the structure rather than your personal bank account and nervous system.

Solo practice can absolutely bring freedom, creativity, and a higher fee per session. It also relocates every decision into your body. Every hat you used to share becomes yours. Fees, policies, marketing, tech, billing, risk planning, and client acquisition all live on the same nervous system that just spent the last fifty minutes holding someone else’s pain. Some therapists thrive here. Others discover the “freedom” comes with decision density, admin creep, and a constant background hum of financial uncertainty unless they intentionally build serious scaffolding.

Flat-rate employee models can feel stabilizing because the math looks predictable. The trade is that sustainability often depends on consistency and volume. Because the business is carrying more payroll risk, expectations tend to be clearer and caseload demands can run higher. Predictable does not always mean supportive.

Contractor and platform rates are where therapists get tricked the most, because the advertised rate looks like the whole story. It isn’t. Contractor work is 1099. That means no benefits, no employer-paid taxes, and often minimal support beyond basic tech. A $100 contractor session is gross revenue, not take-home. Once taxes, self-funded benefits, professional expenses, and unpaid labor are accounted for, that $100 can realistically land closer to half in usable value. It can be a bridge. It becomes risky when mistaken for stability.

Just as importantly, the pay model inside a practice matters as much as the practice itself. You can choose the right door and still end up in the wrong room if the compensation structure doesn’t match your nervous system, life season, or risk tolerance. Burnout is often the result of misaligned pay models, not weak boundaries.

The real deciding factor is rarely intelligence or confidence. It’s capacity and resourcing. Savings. Benefits access. Dependents. Debt. Health. Nervous system tolerance for variability. Some people can weather slow months without panic. Others can’t, and that has nothing to do with clinical skill.

A sustainable therapist career is usually adaptive, not performative. Many clinicians move between models over time. Group early on. Solo later. Back to group during caregiving seasons. Contractor as a bridge. Hybrid arrangements that match real life instead of career mythology. There is no finish line. There is fit, right now, with permission to reassess later.

So before you decide based on the fantasy of “making more,” ask better questions. What does this model require you to carry every week? Who holds the admin? Who absorbs cancellations? Who pays for your time off, your illness, your continuing education, your healthcare, your retirement, and the parts of this job that don’t bill but still cost you?

Choose the structure and the pay model that let you do good work without sacrificing your future self.
The rest is just noise in a ring light.

Author’s Note

This piece was written because therapists deserve better than career advice delivered through mythology, resentment, or ring-light economics. Too many conversations about going solo, joining a group, or taking a platform role get flattened into moralized stories and rate comparisons that skip the actual mechanics of how these systems function.

This isn’t a recruitment pitch. It’s not a warning label. It’s a field guide.

Storm Haven operates as a private group practice using a percentage-based compensation model, and that inevitably shapes how this is written. Not because one model is inherently superior, but because this structure was chosen intentionally to support nervous system sustainability, flexibility, and neurodivergent-affirming ways of working. This model reflects the values and realities of this season, not a belief that one structure should serve every therapist or every chapter of a career.

Percentage-based models allow clinicians more autonomy over pacing, caseload shape, and energy management without imposing rigid productivity surveillance. They create space for uneven weeks, fluctuating capacity, and human variability without turning those realities into disciplinary issues. For many clinicians, especially those who are neurodivergent or nervous-system sensitive, this matters. Regulation is not just a personal practice. It is shaped by structure.

Shared infrastructure absorbs cognitive load that would otherwise live entirely inside individual bodies. Administrative labor, marketing, billing systems, compliance oversight, and risk buffering are held by the practice rather than quietly siphoning energy from clinicians’ clinical presence. That protection is not theoretical. It shows up in fewer context switches, less decision fatigue, and more capacity to actually do the work therapists are trained to do.

I also wrote this because autonomy is real, and sometimes it is the right next chapter. Solo practice can be a beautiful fit when the resourcing is there and the desire is grounded. Contractor work can be useful in specific seasons when protection exists elsewhere. The point here is not to steer anyone toward a door. It’s to help you see what’s on the other side of each one before you step through.

If this blog does its job, it won’t tell you what to choose. It will help you choose with eyes open, numbers honest, and your nervous system included in the decision.

No shame. No hierarchy. Just clarity.

Written by Jen Hyatt, a licensed psychotherapist at Storm Haven Counseling & Wellness in Temecula, California.

Disclaimer

This blog post is intended for informational and educational purposes only and reflects the author’s perspectives and experiences as a mental health professional. It is not a substitute for formal training, supervision, or individualized clinical guidance. Therapists are encouraged to consult their own professional resources, supervisors, or peers when applying concepts to their practice.